|
|
@ -13,37 +13,39 @@ Can host ppl : na |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's time to travel to the edges because this is where the interesting stuff |
|
|
|
happens. "What is popular" is rarely a question that helps finding edges. |
|
|
|
In this talk round i'll recap what i learned in 15 months of my |
|
|
|
re-juvenated and re-energized quest into decentralization and what it |
|
|
|
means. |
|
|
|
I'd like to recap what i learned in 15 months of my re-juvenated and |
|
|
|
re-energized quest into decentralization and what it might mean. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For one, I'd like to present a question from Gene Youngblood's |
|
|
|
"Secession from the broadcast" lecture [1]: "how can we create on the |
|
|
|
For one, I'd like to forward a question from Gene Youngblood's |
|
|
|
[Secession from the broadcast lecture][1]: "how can we create on the |
|
|
|
same scale as we can destroy?". Gene suggests we need to move away from |
|
|
|
the "Audience nation" by becoming "political actors" instead of |
|
|
|
"interested spectators of action". |
|
|
|
the "audience nation" by becoming "political actors" instead of |
|
|
|
"interested spectators of action". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second, I highlight a thought from Adam Ierymenko [2]: If full |
|
|
|
decentralization is technically too hard currently, can we construct and |
|
|
|
make use of a **Blind Idiot God** (BIG) instance which co-ordinates some |
|
|
|
communication but can not abuse it or even understand what's going on |
|
|
|
precisely? |
|
|
|
Second, I paraphrase a thought from Adam Ierymenko's [I want to |
|
|
|
believe][2]: If full decentralization is technically too hard currently, |
|
|
|
can we construct and make use of a "Blind Idiot God" (BIG) instance |
|
|
|
which co-ordinates some communication but can not abuse it or even |
|
|
|
understand what's going on precisely? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lastly, how can we create sustained systems and products if we |
|
|
|
don't want to imitate the centralized web service cash cow model? |
|
|
|
Lastly, I wonder how can we create sustained systems and services if we |
|
|
|
don't want the centralized web service cash cow control model? |
|
|
|
As Laura Kolbag [3] pointed out recently in Nuernberg, paying |
|
|
|
for software might not be so bad if the "free to use" models |
|
|
|
mean surveillance and centralized control. And she suggests |
|
|
|
that design and useability should drive Open Source software |
|
|
|
mean surveillance and centralized control. And she notes |
|
|
|
that design and useability should drive open source developments |
|
|
|
instead of features and options. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The edges are where we encounter the others, those who are somehow |
|
|
|
not like us. It's a place where i easily run into fears. At the edges |
|
|
|
there is no central authority suggesting what to think or do next. The |
|
|
|
number of people at the edges is by definition lower than in the center. |
|
|
|
But it's where things can happen. Secession from the broadcast. |
|
|
|
The edges are where we encounter the others, those who are somehow unlike. |
|
|
|
It's a place where i easily run into fears and look for friends. At the edges |
|
|
|
there is no central authority suggesting what to think or do next. And |
|
|
|
the number of people at the edges is always lower than in the center. |
|
|
|
But that's fine, this is how things get moving as i've experienced |
|
|
|
myself a number of times now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] http://www.secessionfromthebroadcast.org/2013/10/29/secession-broadcast-internet-crisis-social-control/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2] http://adamierymenko.com/decentralization-i-want-to-believe/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3] https://border-none.net/2014/scene-setters#c81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|