[![Build status ](https://img.shields.io/travis/pegjs/pegjs.svg )](https://travis-ci.org/pegjs/pegjs)
[![npm version ](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/pegjs.svg )](https://www.npmjs.com/package/pegjs)
[![Bower version ](https://img.shields.io/bower/v/pegjs.svg )](https://github.com/pegjs/bower)
[![License ](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-mit-blue.svg )](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
PEG.js
======
PEG.js is a simple parser generator for JavaScript that produces fast parsers
with excellent error reporting. You can use it to process complex data or
computer languages and build transformers, interpreters, compilers and other
tools easily.
Features
--------
* Simple and expressive grammar syntax
* Integrates both lexical and syntactical analysis
* Parsers have excellent error reporting out of the box
* Based on [parsing expression
grammar](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing_expression_grammar) formalism
— more powerful than traditional LL(*k*) and LR(*k*) parsers
* Usable [from your browser ](https://pegjs.org/online ), from the command line,
or via JavaScript API
Getting Started
---------------
[Online version ](https://pegjs.org/online ) is the easiest way to generate a
parser. Just enter your grammar, try parsing few inputs, and download generated
parser code.
Installation
------------
### Node.js
To use the `pegjs` command, install PEG.js globally:
```console
$ npm install -g pegjs
```
To use the JavaScript API, install PEG.js locally:
```console
$ npm install pegjs
```
If you need both the `pegjs` command and the JavaScript API, install PEG.js both
ways.
### Browser
[Download ](https://pegjs.org/#download ) the PEG.js library (regular or minified
version) or install it using Bower:
```console
$ bower install pegjs
```
Generating a Parser
-------------------
PEG.js generates parser from a grammar that describes expected input and can
specify what the parser returns (using semantic actions on matched parts of the
input). Generated parser itself is a JavaScript object with a simple API.
### Command Line
To generate a parser from your grammar, use the `pegjs` command:
```console
$ pegjs arithmetics.pegjs
```
This writes parser source code into a file with the same name as the grammar
file but with “.js” extension. You can also specify the output file explicitly:
```console
$ pegjs -o arithmetics-parser.js arithmetics.pegjs
```
If you omit both input and output file, standard input and output are used.
By default, the generated parser is in the Node.js module format. You can
override this using the `--format` option.
You can tweak the generated parser with several options:
* `--allowed-start-rules` — comma-separated list of rules the parser will be
allowed to start parsing from (default: the first rule in the grammar)
* `--cache` — makes the parser cache results, avoiding exponential parsing
time in pathological cases but making the parser slower
* `--dependency` — makes the parser require a specified dependency (can be
specified multiple times)
* `--export-var` — name of a global variable into which the parser object is
assigned to when no module loader is detected
* `--extra-options` — additional options (in JSON format) to pass to
`peg.generate`
* `--extra-options-file` — file with additional options (in JSON format) to
pass to `peg.generate`
* `--format` — format of the generated parser: `amd` , `commonjs` , `es` ,
`globals` , `umd` (default: `commonjs` )
* `--optimize` — selects between optimizing the generated parser for parsing
speed (`speed`) or code size (`size`) (default: `speed` )
* `--plugin` — makes PEG.js use a specified plugin (can be specified multiple
times)
* `--trace` — makes the parser trace its progress
### JavaScript API
In Node.js, require the PEG.js parser generator module:
```javascript
var peg = require("pegjs");
```
In browser, include the PEG.js library in your web page or application using the
`<script>` tag. If PEG.js detects an AMD loader, it will define itself as a
module, otherwise the API will be available in the `peg` global object.
To generate a parser, call the `peg.generate` method and pass your grammar as a
parameter:
```javascript
var parser = peg.generate("start = ('a' / 'b')+");
```
The method will return generated parser object or its source code as a string
(depending on the value of the `output` option — see below). It will throw an
exception if the grammar is invalid. The exception will contain `message`
property with more details about the error.
You can tweak the generated parser by passing a second parameter with an options
object to `peg.generate` . The following options are supported:
* `allowedStartRules` — rules the parser will be allowed to start parsing from
(default: the first rule in the grammar)
* `cache` — if `true` , makes the parser cache results, avoiding exponential
parsing time in pathological cases but making the parser slower (default:
`false` )
* `dependencies` — parser dependencies, the value is an object which maps
variables used to access the dependencies in the parser to module IDs used
to load them; valid only when `format` is set to `"amd"` , `"commonjs"` ,
`"es"` , or `"umd"` (default: `{}` )
* `exportVar` — name of a global variable into which the parser object is
assigned to when no module loader is detected; valid only when `format` is
set to `"globals"` or `"umd"` (default: `null` )
* `format` — format of the generated parser (`"amd"`, `"bare"` , `"commonjs"` ,
`"es"` , `"globals"` , or `"umd"` ); valid only when `output` is set to
`"source"` (default: `"bare"` )
* `optimize` — selects between optimizing the generated parser for parsing
speed (`"speed"`) or code size (`"size"`) (default: `"speed"` )
* `output` — if set to `"parser"` , the method will return generated parser
object; if set to `"source"` , it will return parser source code as a string
(default: `"parser"` )
* `plugins` — plugins to use
* `trace` — makes the parser trace its progress (default: `false` )
Using the Parser
----------------
Using the generated parser is simple — just call its `parse` method and pass an
input string as a parameter. The method will return a parse result (the exact
value depends on the grammar used to generate the parser) or throw an exception
if the input is invalid. The exception will contain `location` , `expected` ,
`found` , and `message` properties with more details about the error.
```javascript
parser.parse("abba"); // returns ["a", "b", "b", "a"]
parser.parse("abcd"); // throws an exception
```
You can tweak parser behavior by passing a second parameter with an options
object to the `parse` method. The following options are supported:
* `startRule` — name of the rule to start parsing from
* `tracer` — tracer to use
Parsers can also support their own custom options.
Grammar Syntax and Semantics
----------------------------
The grammar syntax is similar to JavaScript in that it is not line-oriented and
ignores whitespace between tokens. You can also use JavaScript-style comments
(`// ...` and `/* ... */` ).
Let's look at example grammar that recognizes simple arithmetic expressions like
`2*(3+4)` . A parser generated from this grammar computes their values.
```pegjs
start
= additive
additive
= left:multiplicative "+" right:additive { return left + right; }
/ multiplicative
multiplicative
= left:primary "*" right:multiplicative { return left * right; }
/ primary
primary
= integer
/ "(" additive:additive ")" { return additive; }
integer "integer"
= digits:[0-9]+ { return parseInt(digits.join(""), 10); }
```
On the top level, the grammar consists of *rules* (in our example, there are
five of them). Each rule has a *name* (e.g. `integer` ) that identifies the rule,
and a *parsing expression* (e.g. `digits:[0-9]+ { return
parseInt(digits.join(""), 10); }`) that defines a pattern to match against the
input text and possibly contains some JavaScript code that determines what
happens when the pattern matches successfully. A rule can also contain
*human-readable name* that is used in error messages (in our example, only the
`integer` rule has a human-readable name). The parsing starts at the first rule,
which is also called the *start rule* .
A rule name must be a JavaScript identifier. It is followed by an equality sign
(“=”) and a parsing expression. If the rule has a human-readable name, it is
written as a JavaScript string between the name and separating equality sign.
Rules need to be separated only by whitespace (their beginning is easily
recognizable), but a semicolon (“;”) after the parsing expression is allowed.
The first rule can be preceded by an *initializer* — a piece of JavaScript code
in curly braces (“{” and “}”). This code is executed before the generated parser
starts parsing. All variables and functions defined in the initializer are
accessible in rule actions and semantic predicates. The code inside the
initializer can access options passed to the parser using the `options`
variable. Curly braces in the initializer code must be balanced. Let's look at
the example grammar from above using a simple initializer.
```pegjs
{
function makeInteger(o) {
return parseInt(o.join(""), 10);
}
}
start
= additive
additive
= left:multiplicative "+" right:additive { return left + right; }
/ multiplicative
multiplicative
= left:primary "*" right:multiplicative { return left * right; }
/ primary
primary
= integer
/ "(" additive:additive ")" { return additive; }
integer "integer"
= digits:[0-9]+ { return makeInteger(digits); }
```
The parsing expressions of the rules are used to match the input text to the
grammar. There are various types of expressions — matching characters or
character classes, indicating optional parts and repetition, etc. Expressions
can also contain references to other rules. See detailed description below.
If an expression successfully matches a part of the text when running the
generated parser, it produces a *match result* , which is a JavaScript value. For
example:
* An expression matching a literal string produces a JavaScript string
containing matched text.
* An expression matching repeated occurrence of some subexpression produces a
JavaScript array with all the matches.
The match results propagate through the rules when the rule names are used in
expressions, up to the start rule. The generated parser returns start rule's
match result when parsing is successful.
One special case of parser expression is a *parser action* — a piece of
JavaScript code inside curly braces (“{” and “}”) that takes match results of
some of the the preceding expressions and returns a JavaScript value. This value
is considered match result of the preceding expression (in other words, the
parser action is a match result transformer).
In our arithmetics example, there are many parser actions. Consider the action
in expression `digits:[0-9]+ { return parseInt(digits.join(""), 10); }` . It
takes the match result of the expression [0-9]+, which is an array of strings
containing digits, as its parameter. It joins the digits together to form a
number and converts it to a JavaScript `number` object.
### Parsing Expression Types
There are several types of parsing expressions, some of them containing
subexpressions and thus forming a recursive structure:
#### "*literal*"<br>'*literal*'
Match exact literal string and return it. The string syntax is the same as in
JavaScript. Appending `i` right after the literal makes the match
case-insensitive.
#### .
Match exactly one character and return it as a string.
#### [*characters*]
Match one character from a set and return it as a string. The characters in the
list can be escaped in exactly the same way as in JavaScript string. The list of
characters can also contain ranges (e.g. `[a-z]` means “all lowercase letters”).
Preceding the characters with `^` inverts the matched set (e.g. `[^a-z]` means
“all character but lowercase letters”). Appending `i` right after the right
bracket makes the match case-insensitive.
#### *rule*
Match a parsing expression of a rule recursively and return its match result.
#### ( *expression* )
Match a subexpression and return its match result.
#### *expression* \*
Match zero or more repetitions of the expression and return their match results
in an array. The matching is greedy, i.e. the parser tries to match the
expression as many times as possible. Unlike in regular expressions, there is no
backtracking.
#### *expression* +
Match one or more repetitions of the expression and return their match results
in an array. The matching is greedy, i.e. the parser tries to match the
expression as many times as possible. Unlike in regular expressions, there is no
backtracking.
#### *expression* ?
Try to match the expression. If the match succeeds, return its match result,
otherwise return `null` . Unlike in regular expressions, there is no
backtracking.
#### & *expression*
Try to match the expression. If the match succeeds, just return `undefined` and
do not consume any input, otherwise consider the match failed.
#### ! *expression*
Try to match the expression. If the match does not succeed, just return
`undefined` and do not consume any input, otherwise consider the match failed.
#### & { *predicate* }
The predicate is a piece of JavaScript code that is executed as if it was inside
a function. It gets the match results of labeled expressions in preceding
expression as its arguments. It should return some JavaScript value using the
`return` statement. If the returned value evaluates to `true` in boolean
context, just return `undefined` and do not consume any input; otherwise
consider the match failed.
The code inside the predicate can access all variables and functions defined in
the initializer at the beginning of the grammar.
The code inside the predicate can also access location information using the
`location` function. It returns an object like this:
```javascript
{
start: { offset: 23, line: 5, column: 6 },
end: { offset: 23, line: 5, column: 6 }
}
```
The `start` and `end` properties both refer to the current parse position. The
`offset` property contains an offset as a zero-based index and `line` and
`column` properties contain a line and a column as one-based indices.
The code inside the predicate can also access options passed to the parser using
the `options` variable.
Note that curly braces in the predicate code must be balanced.
#### ! { *predicate* }
The predicate is a piece of JavaScript code that is executed as if it was inside
a function. It gets the match results of labeled expressions in preceding
expression as its arguments. It should return some JavaScript value using the
`return` statement. If the returned value evaluates to `false` in boolean
context, just return `undefined` and do not consume any input; otherwise
consider the match failed.
The code inside the predicate can access all variables and functions defined in
the initializer at the beginning of the grammar.
The code inside the predicate can also access location information using the
`location` function. It returns an object like this:
```javascript
{
start: { offset: 23, line: 5, column: 6 },
end: { offset: 23, line: 5, column: 6 }
}
```
The `start` and `end` properties both refer to the current parse position. The
`offset` property contains an offset as a zero-based index and `line` and
`column` properties contain a line and a column as one-based indices.
The code inside the predicate can also access options passed to the parser using
the `options` variable.
Note that curly braces in the predicate code must be balanced.
#### $ *expression*
Try to match the expression. If the match succeeds, return the matched text
instead of the match result.
#### *label* : *expression*
Match the expression and remember its match result under given label. The label
must be a JavaScript identifier.
Labeled expressions are useful together with actions, where saved match results
can be accessed by action's JavaScript code.
#### *expression<sub>1</sub>* *expression<sub>2</sub>* ... *expression<sub>n</sub>*
Match a sequence of expressions and return their match results in an array.
#### *expression* { *action* }
Match the expression. If the match is successful, run the action, otherwise
consider the match failed.
The action is a piece of JavaScript code that is executed as if it was inside a
function. It gets the match results of labeled expressions in preceding
expression as its arguments. The action should return some JavaScript value
using the `return` statement. This value is considered match result of the
preceding expression.
Refine error handling further
Before this commit, the |expected| and |error| functions didn't halt the
parsing immediately, but triggered a regular match failure. After they
were called, the parser could backtrack, try another branches, and only
if no other branch succeeded, it triggered an exception with information
possibly based on parameters passed to the |expected| or |error|
function (this depended on positions where failures in other branches
have occurred).
While nice in theory, this solution didn't work well in practice. There
were at least two problems:
1. Action expression could have easily triggered a match failure later
in the input than the action itself. This resulted in the
action-triggered failure to be shadowed by the expression-triggered
one.
Consider the following example:
integer = digits:[0-9]+ {
var result = parseInt(digits.join(""), 10);
if (result % 2 === 0) {
error("The number must be an odd integer.");
return;
}
return result;
}
Given input "2", the |[0-9]+| expression would record a match
failure at position 1 (an unsuccessful attempt to parse yet another
digit after "2"). However, a failure triggered by the |error| call
would occur at position 0.
This problem could have been solved by silencing match failures in
action expressions, but that would lead to severe performance
problems (yes, I tried and measured). Other possible solutions are
hacks which I didn't want to introduce into PEG.js.
2. Triggering a match failure in action code could have lead to
unexpected backtracking.
Consider the following example:
class = "[" (charRange / char)* "]"
charRange = begin:char "-" end:char {
if (begin.data.charCodeAt(0) > end.data.charCodeAt(0)) {
error("Invalid character range: " + begin + "-" + end + ".");
}
// ...
}
char = [a-zA-Z0-9_\-]
Given input "[b-a]", the |charRange| rule would fail, but the
parser would try the |char| rule and succeed repeatedly, resulting
in "b-a" being parsed as a sequence of three |char|'s, which it is
not.
This problem could have been solved by using negative predicates,
but that would complicate the grammar and still wouldn't get rid of
unintuitive behavior.
Given these problems I decided to change the semantics of the |expected|
and |error| functions. They don't interact with regular match failure
mechanism anymore, but they cause and immediate parse failure by
throwing an exception. I think this is more intuitive behavior with less
harmful side effects.
The disadvantage of the new approach is that one can't backtrack from an
action-triggered error. I don't see this as a big deal as I think this
will be rarely needed and one can always use a semantic predicate as a
workaround.
Speed impact
------------
Before: 993.84 kB/s
After: 998.05 kB/s
Difference: 0.42%
Size impact
-----------
Before: 1019968 b
After: 975434 b
Difference: -4.37%
(Measured by /tools/impact with Node.js v0.6.18 on x86_64 GNU/Linux.)
11 years ago
To indicate an error, the code inside the action can invoke the `expected`
function, which makes the parser throw an exception. The function takes two
parameters — a description of what was expected at the current position and
optional location information (the default is what `location` would return — see
below). The description will be used as part of a message of the thrown
exception.
Refine error handling further
Before this commit, the |expected| and |error| functions didn't halt the
parsing immediately, but triggered a regular match failure. After they
were called, the parser could backtrack, try another branches, and only
if no other branch succeeded, it triggered an exception with information
possibly based on parameters passed to the |expected| or |error|
function (this depended on positions where failures in other branches
have occurred).
While nice in theory, this solution didn't work well in practice. There
were at least two problems:
1. Action expression could have easily triggered a match failure later
in the input than the action itself. This resulted in the
action-triggered failure to be shadowed by the expression-triggered
one.
Consider the following example:
integer = digits:[0-9]+ {
var result = parseInt(digits.join(""), 10);
if (result % 2 === 0) {
error("The number must be an odd integer.");
return;
}
return result;
}
Given input "2", the |[0-9]+| expression would record a match
failure at position 1 (an unsuccessful attempt to parse yet another
digit after "2"). However, a failure triggered by the |error| call
would occur at position 0.
This problem could have been solved by silencing match failures in
action expressions, but that would lead to severe performance
problems (yes, I tried and measured). Other possible solutions are
hacks which I didn't want to introduce into PEG.js.
2. Triggering a match failure in action code could have lead to
unexpected backtracking.
Consider the following example:
class = "[" (charRange / char)* "]"
charRange = begin:char "-" end:char {
if (begin.data.charCodeAt(0) > end.data.charCodeAt(0)) {
error("Invalid character range: " + begin + "-" + end + ".");
}
// ...
}
char = [a-zA-Z0-9_\-]
Given input "[b-a]", the |charRange| rule would fail, but the
parser would try the |char| rule and succeed repeatedly, resulting
in "b-a" being parsed as a sequence of three |char|'s, which it is
not.
This problem could have been solved by using negative predicates,
but that would complicate the grammar and still wouldn't get rid of
unintuitive behavior.
Given these problems I decided to change the semantics of the |expected|
and |error| functions. They don't interact with regular match failure
mechanism anymore, but they cause and immediate parse failure by
throwing an exception. I think this is more intuitive behavior with less
harmful side effects.
The disadvantage of the new approach is that one can't backtrack from an
action-triggered error. I don't see this as a big deal as I think this
will be rarely needed and one can always use a semantic predicate as a
workaround.
Speed impact
------------
Before: 993.84 kB/s
After: 998.05 kB/s
Difference: 0.42%
Size impact
-----------
Before: 1019968 b
After: 975434 b
Difference: -4.37%
(Measured by /tools/impact with Node.js v0.6.18 on x86_64 GNU/Linux.)
11 years ago
The code inside an action can also invoke the `error` function, which also makes
the parser throw an exception. The function takes two parameters — an error
message and optional location information (the default is what `location` would
return — see below). The message will be used by the thrown exception.
The code inside the action can access all variables and functions defined in the
initializer at the beginning of the grammar. Curly braces in the action code
must be balanced.
The code inside the action can also access the text matched by the expression
using the `text` function.
The code inside the action can also access location information using the
`location` function. It returns an object like this:
```javascript
{
start: { offset: 23, line: 5, column: 6 },
end: { offset: 25, line: 5, column: 8 }
}
```
The `start` property refers to the position at the beginning of the expression,
the `end` property refers to position after the end of the expression. The
`offset` property contains an offset as a zero-based index and `line` and
`column` properties contain a line and a column as one-based indices.
The code inside the action can also access options passed to the parser using
the `options` variable.
Note that curly braces in the action code must be balanced.
#### *expression<sub>1</sub>* / *expression<sub>2</sub>* / ... / *expression<sub>n</sub>*
Try to match the first expression, if it does not succeed, try the second one,
etc. Return the match result of the first successfully matched expression. If no
expression matches, consider the match failed.
Error Messages
--------------
As described above, you can annotate your grammar rules with human-readable
names that will be used in error messages. For example, this production:
integer "integer"
= digits:[0-9]+
will produce an error message like:
> Expected integer but "a" found.
when parsing a non-number, referencing the human-readable name "integer."
Without the human-readable name, PEG.js instead uses a description of the
character class that failed to match:
> Expected [0-9] but "a" found.
Aside from the text content of messages, human-readable names also have a
subtler effect on *where* errors are reported. PEG.js prefers to match
named rules completely or not at all, but not partially. Unnamed rules,
on the other hand, can produce an error in the middle of their
subexpressions.
For example, for this rule matching a comma-separated list of integers:
seq
= integer ("," integer)*
an input like `1,2,a` produces this error message:
> Expected integer but "a" found.
But if we add a human-readable name to the `seq` production:
seq "list of numbers"
= integer ("," integer)*
then PEG.js prefers an error message that implies a smaller attempted parse
tree:
> Expected end of input but "," found.
Compatibility
-------------
Both the parser generator and generated parsers should run well in the following
environments:
* Node.js 4+
* Internet Explorer 9+
* Edge
* Firefox
* Chrome
* Safari
* Opera
Development
-----------
* [Project website ](https://pegjs.org/ )
* [Wiki ](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/wiki )
* [Source code ](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs )
* [Issue tracker ](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/issues )
* [Google Group ](http://groups.google.com/group/pegjs )
* [Twitter ](http://twitter.com/peg_js )
PEG.js is currently maintained by [Futago-za Ryuu ](https://github.com/futagoza ). Since it's [inception ](https://www.google.com/search?q=inception+meaning ) in 2010, PEG.js was maintained by [David Majda ](https://majda.cz/ ) ([@dmajda](http://twitter.com/dmajda)), until [May 2017 ](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/issues/503 ).
The [Bower package ](https://github.com/pegjs/bower ) is maintained by [Michel Krämer ](http://www.michel-kraemer.com/ ) ([@michelkraemer](https://twitter.com/michelkraemer)).
You are welcome to contribute code. Unless your contribution is really trivial
you should get in touch with me first — this can prevent wasted effort on both
sides. You can send code both as a patch or a GitHub pull request.
Note that PEG.js is still very much work in progress. There are no compatibility
guarantees until version 1.0.