You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

662 lines
24 KiB
Markdown

[![Build status](https://img.shields.io/travis/pegjs/pegjs.svg?label=travis)](https://travis-ci.org/pegjs/pegjs)
[![npm/pegjs version](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/pegjs.svg?label=npm/pegjs)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/pegjs)
[![npm/pegjs-dev version](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/pegjs-dev.svg?label=npm/pegjs-dev)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/pegjs-dev)
[![Bower version](https://img.shields.io/bower/v/pegjs.svg?label=bower/pegjs)](https://github.com/pegjs/bower)
[![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-mit-blue.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
PEG.js is a simple parser generator for JavaScript that produces fast parsers with excellent error reporting. You can use it to
process complex data or computer languages and build transformers, interpreters, compilers and other tools easily.
> PEG.js is still very much work in progress. There are no compatibility guarantees until version 1.0
Table of Contents
-----------------
- [Features](#features)
- [Getting Started](#getting-Started)
- [Installation](#installation)
* [Node.js](#nodejs)
* [Browser](#browser)
* [Latest](#latest)
- [Generating a Parser](#generating-a-parser)
* [Command Line](#command-line)
* [JavaScript API](#javascript-api)
- [Using the Parser](#using-the-parser)
- [Grammar Syntax and Semantics](#grammar-syntax-and-semantics)
* [Case-insensitivity](#case-insensitivity)
* [Backtracking](#backtracking)
* [Parsing Expression Types](#parsing-expression-types)
* [Action Execution Environment](#action-execution-environment)
- [Error Messages](#error-messages)
- [Compatibility](#compatibility)
- [Development](#development)
* [Useful Links](#useful-links)
* [Contribution](#contribution)
Features
--------
13 years ago
* Simple and expressive grammar syntax
* Integrates both lexical and syntactical analysis
* Parsers have excellent error reporting out of the box
* Based on [parsing expression
grammar](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing_expression_grammar) formalism
— more powerful than traditional LL(*k*) and LR(*k*) parsers
* Usable [from your browser](https://pegjs.org/online), from the command line,
or via JavaScript API
13 years ago
Getting Started
---------------
[Online version](https://pegjs.org/online) is the easiest way to generate a
parser. Just enter your grammar, try parsing few inputs, and download generated
parser code.
13 years ago
Installation
------------
### Node.js
13 years ago
To use the `pegjs` command, install PEG.js globally:
```console
$ npm install -g pegjs
```
To use the JavaScript API, install PEG.js locally:
13 years ago
```console
$ npm install pegjs
```
13 years ago
If you need both the `pegjs` command and the JavaScript API, install PEG.js both
ways.
13 years ago
### Browser
[Download](https://pegjs.org/#download) the PEG.js library (regular or minified
version) or install it using Bower:
```console
$ bower install pegjs
```
13 years ago
### Latest
To use the latest features, fixes and changes of PEG.js, directly install from the repository:
```console
$ npm install pegjs/pegjs#master
```
Alternatively, you can use the most recently packaged version of the PEG.js code hosted on GitHub:
```console
$ npm install pegjs-dev
```
13 years ago
Generating a Parser
-------------------
PEG.js generates parser from a grammar that describes expected input and can
specify what the parser returns (using semantic actions on matched parts of the
input). Generated parser itself is a JavaScript object with a simple API.
13 years ago
### Command Line
To generate a parser from your grammar, use the `pegjs` command:
```console
$ pegjs arithmetics.pegjs
```
13 years ago
This writes parser source code into a file with the same name as the grammar
file but with “.js” extension. You can also specify the output file explicitly:
13 years ago
```console
$ pegjs -o arithmetics-parser.js arithmetics.pegjs
```
13 years ago
If you omit both input and output file, standard input and output are used.
13 years ago
By default, the generated parser is in the Node.js module format. You can
override this using the `--format` option.
You can tweak the generated parser with several options:
* `-a`, `--allowed-start-rules` — comma-separated list of rules the parser will be allowed to start parsing from (default: the first rule in the grammar)
* `--cache` — makes the parser cache results, avoiding exponential parsing time in pathological cases but making the parser slower
* `-d`, `--dependency` — makes the parser require a specified dependency (can be specified multiple times)
* `-e`, `--export-var` — name of a global variable into which the parser object is assigned to when no module loader is detected
* `--extra-options` — additional options (in JSON format) to pass to `peg.generate`
* `-c`, `--config`, `--extra-options-file` — file with additional options (in JSON format) to pass to `peg.generate`
* `-f`, `--format` — format of the generated parser: `amd`, `bare`, `commonjs`, `es`, `globals`, `umd` (default: `commonjs`)
* `-O`, `--optimize` — selects between optimizing the generated parser for parsing speed (`speed`) or code size (`size`) (default: `speed`)
* `-p`, `--plugin` — makes PEG.js use a specified plugin (can be specified multiple times)
Implement basic support for tracing Parsers can now be generated with support for tracing using the --trace CLI option or a boolean |trace| option to |PEG.buildParser|. This makes them trace their progress, which can be useful for debugging. Parsers generated with tracing support are called "tracing parsers". When a tracing parser executes, by default it traces the rules it enters and exits by writing messages to the console. For example, a parser built from this grammar: start = a / b a = "a" b = "b" will write this to the console when parsing input "b": 1:1 rule.enter start 1:1 rule.enter a 1:1 rule.fail a 1:1 rule.enter b 1:2 rule.match b 1:2 rule.match start You can customize tracing by passing a custom *tracer* to parser's |parse| method using the |tracer| option: parser.parse(input, { trace: tracer }); This will replace the built-in default tracer (which writes to the console) by the tracer you supplied. The tracer must be an object with a |trace| method. This method is called each time a tracing event happens. It takes one argument which is an object describing the tracing event. Currently, three events are supported: * rule.enter -- triggered when a rule is entered * rule.match -- triggered when a rule matches successfully * rule.fail -- triggered when a rule fails to match These events are triggered in nested pairs -- for each rule.enter event there is a matching rule.match or rule.fail event. The event object passed as an argument to |trace| contains these properties: * type -- event type * rule -- name of the rule the event is related to * offset -- parse position at the time of the event * line -- line at the time of the event * column -- column at the time of the event * result -- rule's match result (only for rule.match event) The whole tracing API is somewhat experimental (which is why it isn't documented properly yet) and I expect it will evolve over time as experience is gained. The default tracer is also somewhat bare-bones. I hope that PEG.js user community will develop more sophisticated tracers over time and I'll be able to integrate their best ideas into the default tracer.
9 years ago
* `--trace` — makes the parser trace its progress
**NOTE:** On the command line, unless it's a repeatable option, any option on the right side will take priority over either the same option mentioned
before or it's counter part:
- `pegjs -f es -f bare` will set `options.format` to `bare`
- `pegjs --no-trace --trace` will set `options.trace` to `true`
- `pegjs -a start,Rule -a Rule,Template` will set `options.allowedStartRules` to `[ "start", "Rule", "Template" ]`
13 years ago
### JavaScript API
13 years ago
In Node.js, require the PEG.js parser generator module:
```javascript
var peg = require("pegjs");
```
In browser, include the PEG.js library in your web page or application using the
`<script>` tag. If PEG.js detects an AMD loader, it will define itself as a
module, otherwise the API will be available in the `peg` global object.
To generate a parser, call the `peg.generate` method and pass your grammar as a
parameter:
14 years ago
```javascript
var parser = peg.generate("start = ('a' / 'b')+");
```
13 years ago
The method will return generated parser object or its source code as a string
(depending on the value of the `output` option — see below). It will throw an
exception if the grammar is invalid. The exception will contain `message`
property with more details about the error.
13 years ago
You can tweak the generated parser by passing a second parameter with an options
object to `peg.generate`. The following options are supported:
* `allowedStartRules` — rules the parser will be allowed to start parsing from (default: the first rule in the grammar)
* `cache` — if `true`, makes the parser cache results, avoiding exponential parsing time in pathological cases but making the parser slower (default: `false`)
* `dependencies` — parser dependencies, the value is an object which maps variables used to access the dependencies to module IDs used to load them;<br>
valid only when `format` is set to `"amd"`, `"commonjs"`, `"es"`, or `"umd"` (default: `{}`)
* `exportVar` — name of an optional global variable into which the parser object is assigned to when no module loader is detected;
valid only when `format` is set to `"globals"` or `"umd"`
* `format` — format of the generated parser (`"amd"`, `"bare"`, `"commonjs"`, `"es"`, `"globals"`, or `"umd"`);
valid only when `output` is set to `"source"` (default: `"bare"`)
* `optimize`— selects between optimizing the generated parser for parsing speed (`"speed"`) or code size (`"size"`) (default: `"speed"`)
* `output` — if set to `"parser"` (default), the method will return generated parser object;
if set to `"source"`, it will return parser source code as a string
* `plugins` — plugins to use
* `trace` — makes the parser trace its progress (default: `false`)
13 years ago
Using the Parser
----------------
Using the generated parser is simple — just call its `parse` method and pass an
input string as a parameter. The method will return a parse result (the exact
value depends on the grammar used to generate the parser) or throw an exception
if the input is invalid. The exception will contain `location`, `expected`,
`found`, and `message` properties with more details about the error.
13 years ago
```javascript
parser.parse("abba"); // returns ["a", "b", "b", "a"]
14 years ago
parser.parse("abcd"); // throws an exception
```
13 years ago
You can tweak parser behavior by passing a second parameter with an options
Implement basic support for tracing Parsers can now be generated with support for tracing using the --trace CLI option or a boolean |trace| option to |PEG.buildParser|. This makes them trace their progress, which can be useful for debugging. Parsers generated with tracing support are called "tracing parsers". When a tracing parser executes, by default it traces the rules it enters and exits by writing messages to the console. For example, a parser built from this grammar: start = a / b a = "a" b = "b" will write this to the console when parsing input "b": 1:1 rule.enter start 1:1 rule.enter a 1:1 rule.fail a 1:1 rule.enter b 1:2 rule.match b 1:2 rule.match start You can customize tracing by passing a custom *tracer* to parser's |parse| method using the |tracer| option: parser.parse(input, { trace: tracer }); This will replace the built-in default tracer (which writes to the console) by the tracer you supplied. The tracer must be an object with a |trace| method. This method is called each time a tracing event happens. It takes one argument which is an object describing the tracing event. Currently, three events are supported: * rule.enter -- triggered when a rule is entered * rule.match -- triggered when a rule matches successfully * rule.fail -- triggered when a rule fails to match These events are triggered in nested pairs -- for each rule.enter event there is a matching rule.match or rule.fail event. The event object passed as an argument to |trace| contains these properties: * type -- event type * rule -- name of the rule the event is related to * offset -- parse position at the time of the event * line -- line at the time of the event * column -- column at the time of the event * result -- rule's match result (only for rule.match event) The whole tracing API is somewhat experimental (which is why it isn't documented properly yet) and I expect it will evolve over time as experience is gained. The default tracer is also somewhat bare-bones. I hope that PEG.js user community will develop more sophisticated tracers over time and I'll be able to integrate their best ideas into the default tracer.
9 years ago
object to the `parse` method. The following options are supported:
* `startRule` — name of the rule to start parsing from
Implement basic support for tracing Parsers can now be generated with support for tracing using the --trace CLI option or a boolean |trace| option to |PEG.buildParser|. This makes them trace their progress, which can be useful for debugging. Parsers generated with tracing support are called "tracing parsers". When a tracing parser executes, by default it traces the rules it enters and exits by writing messages to the console. For example, a parser built from this grammar: start = a / b a = "a" b = "b" will write this to the console when parsing input "b": 1:1 rule.enter start 1:1 rule.enter a 1:1 rule.fail a 1:1 rule.enter b 1:2 rule.match b 1:2 rule.match start You can customize tracing by passing a custom *tracer* to parser's |parse| method using the |tracer| option: parser.parse(input, { trace: tracer }); This will replace the built-in default tracer (which writes to the console) by the tracer you supplied. The tracer must be an object with a |trace| method. This method is called each time a tracing event happens. It takes one argument which is an object describing the tracing event. Currently, three events are supported: * rule.enter -- triggered when a rule is entered * rule.match -- triggered when a rule matches successfully * rule.fail -- triggered when a rule fails to match These events are triggered in nested pairs -- for each rule.enter event there is a matching rule.match or rule.fail event. The event object passed as an argument to |trace| contains these properties: * type -- event type * rule -- name of the rule the event is related to * offset -- parse position at the time of the event * line -- line at the time of the event * column -- column at the time of the event * result -- rule's match result (only for rule.match event) The whole tracing API is somewhat experimental (which is why it isn't documented properly yet) and I expect it will evolve over time as experience is gained. The default tracer is also somewhat bare-bones. I hope that PEG.js user community will develop more sophisticated tracers over time and I'll be able to integrate their best ideas into the default tracer.
9 years ago
* `tracer` — tracer to use
Parsers can also support their own custom options.
13 years ago
Grammar Syntax and Semantics
----------------------------
The grammar syntax is similar to JavaScript in that it is not line-oriented and
ignores whitespace between tokens. You can also use JavaScript-style comments
(`// ...` and `/* ... */`).
13 years ago
Let's look at example grammar that recognizes simple arithmetic expressions like
`2*(3+4)`. A parser generated from this grammar computes their values.
13 years ago
```pegjs
start
= additive
13 years ago
additive
= left:multiplicative "+" right:additive { return left + right; }
/ multiplicative
13 years ago
multiplicative
= left:primary "*" right:multiplicative { return left * right; }
/ primary
13 years ago
primary
= integer
/ "(" additive:additive ")" { return additive; }
13 years ago
integer "integer"
= digits:[0-9]+ { return parseInt(digits.join(""), 10); }
```
13 years ago
On the top level, the grammar consists of *rules* (in our example, there are
five of them). Each rule has a *name* (e.g. `integer`) that identifies the rule,
and a *parsing expression* (e.g. `digits:[0-9]+ { return
parseInt(digits.join(""), 10); }`) that defines a pattern to match against the
input text and possibly contains some JavaScript code that determines what
happens when the pattern matches successfully. A rule can also contain
*human-readable name* that is used in error messages (in our example, only the
`integer` rule has a human-readable name). The parsing starts at the first rule,
which is also called the *start rule*.
A rule name must be a JavaScript identifier. It is followed by an equality sign
(“=”) and a parsing expression. If the rule has a human-readable name, it is
written as a JavaScript string between the name and separating equality sign.
Rules need to be separated only by whitespace (their beginning is easily
recognizable), but a semicolon (“;”) after the parsing expression is allowed.
The first rule can be preceded by an *initializer* — a piece of JavaScript code
in curly braces (“{” and “}”). This code is executed before the generated parser
starts parsing. All variables and functions defined in the initializer are
accessible in rule actions and semantic predicates. The code inside the
initializer can access options passed to the parser using the `options`
variable. Curly braces in the initializer code must be balanced. Let's look at
the example grammar from above using a simple initializer.
```pegjs
{
function makeInteger(o) {
return parseInt(o.join(""), 10);
}
}
start
= additive
additive
= left:multiplicative "+" right:additive { return left + right; }
/ multiplicative
multiplicative
= left:primary "*" right:multiplicative { return left * right; }
/ primary
primary
= integer
/ "(" additive:additive ")" { return additive; }
integer "integer"
= digits:[0-9]+ { return makeInteger(digits); }
```
The parsing expressions of the rules are used to match the input text to the
grammar. There are various types of expressions — matching characters or
character classes, indicating optional parts and repetition, etc. Expressions
can also contain references to other rules. See detailed description below.
If an expression successfully matches a part of the text when running the
generated parser, it produces a *match result*, which is a JavaScript value. For
example:
* An expression matching a literal string produces a JavaScript string
containing matched text.
* An expression matching repeated occurrence of some subexpression produces a
JavaScript array with all the matches.
The match results propagate through the rules when the rule names are used in
expressions, up to the start rule. The generated parser returns start rule's
match result when parsing is successful.
One special case of parser expression is a *parser action* — a piece of
JavaScript code inside curly braces (“{” and “}”) that takes match results of
some of the the preceding expressions and returns a JavaScript value. This value
is considered match result of the preceding expression (in other words, the
parser action is a match result transformer).
In our arithmetics example, there are many parser actions. Consider the action
in expression `digits:[0-9]+ { return parseInt(digits.join(""), 10); }`. It
takes the match result of the expression [0-9]+, which is an array of strings
containing digits, as its parameter. It joins the digits together to form a
number and converts it to a JavaScript `number` object.
14 years ago
### Case-insensitivity
Appending `i` right after either [a literal](#literalliteral) or a [a character set](#characters) makes the match
case-insensitive. The rules shown in the following example all produce the same result:
```pegjs
a1 = "a" / "b" / "c" / "A" / "B" / "C"
a2 = "a"i / "b"i / "c"i
a3 = [a-cA-C]
a4 = [a-c]i
```
### Backtracking
Unlike in regular expressions, there is no backtracking in PEG.js expressions.
For example, using the input "hi!":
```pegjs
// This will fail
HI = "hi" / "hi!"
// This will pass
HI = "hi!" / "hi"
// This will also pass
HI = w:"hi" !"!" { return w } / "hi!"
```
For more information on backtracking in PEG, [checkout this excellent answer on Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/a/24809596/1518408).
13 years ago
### Parsing Expression Types
There are several types of parsing expressions, some of them containing
subexpressions and thus forming a recursive structure:
* ["literal"](#literalliteral)
* [. (dot character)](#-dot-character)
* [[characters]](#characters)
* [rule](#rule)
* [( expression )](#-expression-)
* [expression *](#expression-)
* [expression +](#expression--1)
* [expression ?](#expression--2)
* [& expression](#-expression)
* [! expression](#-expression-1)
* [& { predicate }](#--predicate-)
* [! { predicate }](#--predicate--1)
* [$ expression](#-expression-2)
* [label : expression](#label--expression)
* [expression1 expression2 ... expressionN](#expression1-expression2---expressionn)
* [expression { action }](#expression--action-)
* [expression1 / expression2 / ... / expressionN](#expression1--expression2----expressionn)
13 years ago
#### "*literal*"<br>'*literal*'
Match exact literal string and return it. The string syntax is the same as in
JavaScript. Appending `i` right after the literal makes the match
case-insensitive.
#### . *(dot character)*
14 years ago
13 years ago
Match exactly one character and return it as a string.
13 years ago
#### [*characters*]
Match one character from a set and return it as a string. The characters in the
list can be escaped in exactly the same way as in JavaScript string. The list of
characters can also contain ranges (e.g. `[a-z]` means “all lowercase letters”).
Preceding the characters with `^` inverts the matched set (e.g. `[^a-z]` means
“all character but lowercase letters”). Appending `i` right after the right
bracket makes the match case-insensitive.
13 years ago
#### *rule*
Match a parsing expression of a rule recursively and return its match result.
#### ( *expression* )
Match a subexpression and return its match result.
#### *expression* \*
Match zero or more repetitions of the expression and return their match results
in an array. The matching is greedy, i.e. the parser tries to match the
expression as many times as possible. Unlike in regular expressions, there is no
backtracking.
13 years ago
#### *expression* +
Match one or more repetitions of the expression and return their match results
in an array. The matching is greedy, i.e. the parser tries to match the
expression as many times as possible. Unlike in regular expressions, there is no
backtracking.
13 years ago
#### *expression* ?
Try to match the expression. If the match succeeds, return its match result,
otherwise return `null`. Unlike in regular expressions, there is no
backtracking.
13 years ago
#### & *expression*
Try to match the expression. If the match succeeds, just return `undefined` and
do not consume any input, otherwise consider the match failed.
13 years ago
#### ! *expression*
Try to match the expression. If the match does not succeed, just return
`undefined` and do not consume any input, otherwise consider the match failed.
13 years ago
#### & { *predicate* }
This is a positive assertion. No input is consumed.
The predicate should be JavaScript code, and it's executed as a
function. Curly braces in the predicate must be balanced.
The predicate should `return` a boolean value. If the result is
truthy, the match result is `undefined`, otherwise the match is
considered failed.
The predicate has access to all variables and functions in the
[Action Execution Environment](#action-execution-environment).
13 years ago
#### ! { *predicate* }
This is a negative assertion. No input is consumed.
The predicate should be JavaScript code, and it's executed as a
function. Curly braces in the predicate must be balanced.
The predicate should `return` a boolean value. If the result is
falsy, the match result is `undefined`, otherwise the match is
considered failed.
The predicate has access to all variables and functions in the
[Action Execution Environment](#action-execution-environment).
13 years ago
#### $ *expression*
Try to match the expression. If the match succeeds, return the matched text
instead of the match result.
13 years ago
#### *label* : *expression*
Match the expression and remember its match result under given label. The label
must be a JavaScript identifier.
13 years ago
Labeled expressions are useful together with actions, where saved match results
can be accessed by action's JavaScript code.
13 years ago
#### *expression<sub>1</sub>* *expression<sub>2</sub>* ... *expression<sub>n</sub>*
13 years ago
Match a sequence of expressions and return their match results in an array.
#### *expression* { *action* }
If the expression matches successfully, run the action, otherwise
consider the match failed.
13 years ago
The action should be JavaScript code, and it's executed as a
function. Curly braces in the action must be balanced.
13 years ago
The action should `return` some value, which will be used as the
match result of the expression.
Refine error handling further Before this commit, the |expected| and |error| functions didn't halt the parsing immediately, but triggered a regular match failure. After they were called, the parser could backtrack, try another branches, and only if no other branch succeeded, it triggered an exception with information possibly based on parameters passed to the |expected| or |error| function (this depended on positions where failures in other branches have occurred). While nice in theory, this solution didn't work well in practice. There were at least two problems: 1. Action expression could have easily triggered a match failure later in the input than the action itself. This resulted in the action-triggered failure to be shadowed by the expression-triggered one. Consider the following example: integer = digits:[0-9]+ { var result = parseInt(digits.join(""), 10); if (result % 2 === 0) { error("The number must be an odd integer."); return; } return result; } Given input "2", the |[0-9]+| expression would record a match failure at position 1 (an unsuccessful attempt to parse yet another digit after "2"). However, a failure triggered by the |error| call would occur at position 0. This problem could have been solved by silencing match failures in action expressions, but that would lead to severe performance problems (yes, I tried and measured). Other possible solutions are hacks which I didn't want to introduce into PEG.js. 2. Triggering a match failure in action code could have lead to unexpected backtracking. Consider the following example: class = "[" (charRange / char)* "]" charRange = begin:char "-" end:char { if (begin.data.charCodeAt(0) > end.data.charCodeAt(0)) { error("Invalid character range: " + begin + "-" + end + "."); } // ... } char = [a-zA-Z0-9_\-] Given input "[b-a]", the |charRange| rule would fail, but the parser would try the |char| rule and succeed repeatedly, resulting in "b-a" being parsed as a sequence of three |char|'s, which it is not. This problem could have been solved by using negative predicates, but that would complicate the grammar and still wouldn't get rid of unintuitive behavior. Given these problems I decided to change the semantics of the |expected| and |error| functions. They don't interact with regular match failure mechanism anymore, but they cause and immediate parse failure by throwing an exception. I think this is more intuitive behavior with less harmful side effects. The disadvantage of the new approach is that one can't backtrack from an action-triggered error. I don't see this as a big deal as I think this will be rarely needed and one can always use a semantic predicate as a workaround. Speed impact ------------ Before: 993.84 kB/s After: 998.05 kB/s Difference: 0.42% Size impact ----------- Before: 1019968 b After: 975434 b Difference: -4.37% (Measured by /tools/impact with Node.js v0.6.18 on x86_64 GNU/Linux.)
11 years ago
The action has access to all variables and functions in the
[Action Execution Environment](#action-execution-environment).
#### *expression<sub>1</sub>* / *expression<sub>2</sub>* / ... / *expression<sub>n</sub>*
Try to match the first expression, if it does not succeed, try the second one,
etc. Return the match result of the first successfully matched expression. If no
expression matches, consider the match failed.
### Action Execution Environment
Actions and predicates have these variables and functions
available to them.
* All variables and functions defined in the initializer at the
beginning of the grammar are available.
* Labels from preceding expressions are available as local
variables, which will have the match result of the labelled
expressions.
A label is only available after its labelled expression is
matched:
```pegjs
rule = A:('a' B:'b' { /* B is available, A is not */ } )
```
13 years ago
A label in a sub-expression is only valid within the
sub-expression:
13 years ago
```pegjs
rule = A:'a' (B: 'b') (C: 'b' { /* A and C are available, B is not */ })
```
* `options` is a variable that contains the parser options.
* `error(message, where)` will report an error and throw an
exception. `where` is optional; the default is the value of
`location()`.
* `expected(message, where)` is similar to `error`, but reports
> Expected _message_ but "_other_" found.
* `location()` returns an object like this:
```javascript
{
start: { offset: 23, line: 5, column: 6 },
end: { offset: 25, line: 5, column: 8 }
}
```
For actions, `start` refers to the position at the beginning of
the preceding expression, and `end` refers to the position
after the end of the preceding expression.
For predicates, `start` and `end` are the same, the location
where the predicate is evaluated.
`offset` is a 0-based character index within the source text.
`line` and `column` are 1-based indices.
Note that `line` and `column` are somewhat expensive to
compute, so if you need location frequently, you might want to
use `offset()` or `range()` instead.
* `offset()` returns the start offset.
* `range()` returns an array containing the start and end
offsets, such as `[23, 25]`.
* `text()` returns the source text between `start` and `end`
(which will be "" for predicates).
Error Messages
--------------
As described above, you can annotate your grammar rules with human-readable
names that will be used in error messages. For example, this production:
integer "integer"
= digits:[0-9]+
will produce an error message like:
> Expected integer but "a" found.
when parsing a non-number, referencing the human-readable name "integer."
Without the human-readable name, PEG.js instead uses a description of the
character class that failed to match:
> Expected [0-9] but "a" found.
Aside from the text content of messages, human-readable names also have a
subtler effect on *where* errors are reported. PEG.js prefers to match
named rules completely or not at all, but not partially. Unnamed rules,
on the other hand, can produce an error in the middle of their
subexpressions.
For example, for this rule matching a comma-separated list of integers:
seq
= integer ("," integer)*
an input like `1,2,a` produces this error message:
> Expected integer but "a" found.
But if we add a human-readable name to the `seq` production:
seq "list of numbers"
= integer ("," integer)*
then PEG.js prefers an error message that implies a smaller attempted parse
tree:
> Expected end of input but "," found.
Compatibility
-------------
Both the parser generator and generated parsers should run well in the following
environments:
* Node.js 4+
* Internet Explorer 9+
* Edge
* Firefox
* Chrome
* Safari
* Opera
13 years ago
Development
-----------
PEG.js is currently maintained by [Futago-za Ryuu](https://github.com/futagoza). Since it's [inception](https://www.google.com/search?q=inception+meaning) in 2010, PEG.js was maintained by [David Majda](https://majda.cz/) ([@dmajda](http://twitter.com/dmajda)), until [May 2017](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/issues/503).
The [Bower package](https://github.com/pegjs/bower) is maintained by [Michel Krämer](http://www.michel-kraemer.com/) ([@michelkraemer](https://twitter.com/michelkraemer)).
### Useful Links
* [Project website](https://pegjs.org/)
* [Wiki](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/wiki)
* [Source code](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs)
* [Issue tracker](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/issues)
13 years ago
* [Google Group](http://groups.google.com/group/pegjs)
* [Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/pegjs)
13 years ago
* [Twitter](http://twitter.com/peg_js)
### Contribution
You are welcome to contribute code using [GitHub pull requests](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/pulls). Unless your contribution is really trivial you should get in touch with me first (preferably by creating a new issue on the [issue tracker](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/issues)) - this can prevent wasted effort on both sides.
> Before submitting a pull request, please make sure you've checked out the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
1. Create a fork of https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs
2. Clone your fork, and optionally create a new branch
3. Run the command `npm install` from the root of your clone
4. Add and commit your changes
5. Validate your changes:
- Lint the JavaScript changes (command line only, run `gulp lint` or `npm run lint`)
- Run tests to ensure nothing's broken: [see separate documentation](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/blob/master/test/README.md)
- Optionally, check benchmark results: [see separate documentation](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/blob/master/benchmark/README.md)
- Optionally, check commit impact (this is a bash script, run `tools/impact`)
6. If validation fails: reverse your commit, fix the problem and then add/commit again
7. Push the commits from your clone to the fork
8. From your fork, start a new pull request
It's also a good idea to check out the [gulpfile.js](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/blob/master/gulpfile.js) that defines
various tasks that are commented with a description of each task.
13 years ago
To see the list of contributors check out the [repository's contributors page](https://github.com/pegjs/pegjs/graphs/contributors).