This is related to my last commit. I've updated all the JavaScript files to satisfy 'eslint-config-futagozaryuu', my eslint configuration.
I'm sure I've probally missed something, but I've run all NPM scripts and Gulp tasks, fixed any bugs that cropped up, and updated some stuff (mainly related to generated messages), so as far as I can, tell this conversion is over (I know I've probally jixed it just by saying this ;P).
* Do not indent backtick quoted strings in initializer or rule action code blocks
* Use const instead of var for ESLint happiness
* Fix ESLint issues for double quotes and indent6
This fixes the following ESLint error, which started to appear after
eslint/eslint#7424 was fixed:
/Users/dmajda/Programming/PEG.js/pegjs/lib/compiler/js.js
37:17 error Unnecessary escape character: \] no-useless-escape
This should fix broken Travis CI builds:
https://travis-ci.org/pegjs/pegjs/builds/180092802
Generating AMD/UMD dependencies lead to an error:
$ bin/pegjs --format amd --dependency $:jquery examples/arithmetics.pegjs
dependencyIds is not defined
$ bin/pegjs --format umd --dependency $:jquery examples/arithmetics.pegjs
dependencyIds is not defined
This commit fixes the problem, which was caused by a mistake done in
d2569b9bf3.
The "global-require" rule is disabled in ESLint configuration used by
PEG.js, but the idea is not bad, so let's make all static "require"
calls global.
Follow-up to #407.
Running ESLint on generated code with the configuration used on PEG.js
itself produces a lot of errors. This commit fixes some unnecessary ones
caught by these rules:
- max-len
- new-cap
- newline-before-return
- no-unused-vars
See also 5dd8e797f7.
Follow-up to #407.
Before this commit, continuation lines of multi-line values in variable
declaration initializers were aligned with the variable name:
let foo = {
a: 5,
b: 6
};
This was highly irregular, maintenance intensive, and made declarations
look different from assignments.
This commit changes the indentation to be more regular and similar to
assignments:
let foo = {
a: 5,
b: 6
};
Use one var/let/const per variable, but only for initialized variables.
Uninitialized variables are still grouped into one var/let/const
declaration as I don't see any value in separating them. This approach
reflects the fact that initialized and uninitialized var/let/const
declarations are really two different things.
See #443.
The for-in statement in JavaScript iterates also over inherited
properties. This is typically not desired and requires adding a
check using Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty inside the loop.
This commit replaces all for-in statements and related checks inside
them with iteration over Object.keys(...). The iteration is performed
using either Array.prototype.forEach of a plain for loop.
Because arrow functions work rather differently than normal functions (a
bad design mistake if you ask me), I decided to be conservative with the
conversion.
I converted:
* event handlers
* callbacks
* arguments to Array.prototype.map & co.
* small standalone lambda functions
I didn't convert:
* functions assigned to object literal properties (the new shorthand
syntax would be better here)
* functions passed to "describe", "it", etc. in specs (because Jasmine
relies on dynamic "this")
See #442.
This is purely a mechanical change, not taking advantage of block scope
of "let" and "const". Minimizing variable scope will come in the next
commit.
In general, "var" is converted into "let" and "const" is used only for
immutable variables of permanent character (generally spelled in
ALL_CAPS). Using it for any immutable variable regardless on its
permanence would feel confusing.
Any code which is not transpiled and needs to run in ES6 environment
(examples, code in grammars embedded in specs, ...) is kept unchanged.
This is also true for code generated by PEG.js.
See #442.
Futago-za Ryuu
felix
Alan Mimms
Mingun
fatfisz
David Majda